Search This Blog

Showing posts with label conversation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label conversation. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 29, 2025

Dare to Lead by Brené Brown

Brené Brown has established herself as a prominent figure in the realm of team leadership and building corporate work culture, but her work extends into and resonates deeply with teaching and education. It’s about time that I engage with her work, so here we are with Dare to Lead. I listened to the audiobook, read by Brown herself with some welcome tangents and clarifying remarks that add to the original text. Having finished this book, I can understand why her work is so broadly accepted. She offers clear, insightful, and manageable guidelines for engaging with others as a leader, whatever form that might take.

When it comes to nonfiction books, Dare to Lead is comparatively short but still offers a comprehensive guide for a few core concepts. One of the common threads is how emotional intelligence influences our work as leaders. Leaders require a level of vulnerability when engaging with others and making decisions. In one moment, Brown clarifies how to practice vulnerability in response to a misunderstanding with one of her workshop attendees. After discussing vulnerability and openness, the man came up to her and said he was going to start divulging all kinds of personal information and discuss his doubts in the work and so on and so forth. She clarifies that vulnerability and openness does not divulging everything—divulging everything, especially in a business meeting, could send people into a panic. Instead, it requires a fine balance and sharing only what is pertinent to help enable the team. There’s a closer affinity to accountability than oversharing.

Some moments were more resonant with me as an educator. Within systems, peoples’ values can often clash. We have different visions of how institutions should operate and what our outcomes could be. One section of the book outlines an exercise she does with her audiences where they have to select their core values. She talks about narrowing down to two core values to guide our actions. If we are not able to narrow our values down to two, our scope is too big and we don’t have the focus for our decision making. It’s a little bit cheezy, but there’s an administrator I work with who encourages us on the first day to choose one value to focus on and I’ve gained a new appreciation for that level of intention.

Teaching can often be contentious. Brown presents several ideas for better management and thoughtfulness. One of the practices she holds with her team is that everyone has the power to call a time out during meetings. It’s a smart idea to say “I need time to think about what I’m hearing” and not come to immediate decisions. As we know as teachers, building in “wait time” and giving students time to think increases the depth of thinking, so logically the same would apply for adults. She says that calling a time out gives reasonable thinking time and it cuts down on the “meeting after the meeting” and backchannels, ultimately leading to more transparency and better decision making. I love that.

I also appreciate the way that Brown establishes healthy boundaries while maintaining empathy. One of the passages that really resonated with me is when she writes, 

We can’t do our jobs when we own other peoples’ emotions or take responsibility for them as a way to control related behaviours for one simple reason: other peoples’ emotions are not our jobs. We can’t both serve people and try to control their feelings. Daring leadership is ultimately about serving other people, not ourselves. That’s why we choose courage.

So much of our work as educators requires navigating others’ emotions, at least it feels that way. Whether it’s a student being upset about not getting a grade, or a parent being angry because their child has been accused of cheating, or whether colleagues have different views on which pedagogies are most effective—it can get uncomfortable. Brown gives permission to separate other peoples’ feelings from our decision making. It really is about serving others, not necessarily about making others happy (although it’s a nice byproduct of being transparent, vulnerable, and collaborative). In that vein, Brown also gives advice to people who are trying to demonstrate empathy to others. She says that “empathy is not connecting to an experience. It’s connecting to the emotions that underpin an experience.” I liked that, because I think a lot of people say, “well I’ve never been through that thing” and try to exclude themselves from confronting those hard feelings. It’s well-intentioned, generally, but this gives us the power to maintain connection without imposing our own half-connected experiences. Brown illustrates the example with a personal anecdote involving high emotions in an airport and it was a beautiful demonstration of how to engage with others without owning their emotions or imposing your own experiences.

Overall, Dare to Lead gives a really nice framework for some foundational qualities. I hope it makes me a better leader and decision maker. Keep your fingers crossed for me.

Happy reading!

Sunday, February 26, 2023

Pimsleur Punjabi Conversational Course Level 1 Lessons 1-5

    Sat Sri Akaal, friends.

    I’ve been doing book reviews for years, but this book is the first of its kind. The Pimsleur Punjabi Conversational Course is a language-learning tool that, as you have likely guessed, is intended to help me learn Punjabi.


    I got the book as an audiobook, which is really its only functional format. In fact, the book’s introduction explicitly states that you should not look up words or consider spelling when engaging with the Pimsleur method. The method then relies on a lot of repetition; the narrators introduce phrases, you repeat them back syllable-by-syllable and then as whole words. I can’t deny that the repetition is effective; I feel like I’ll always remember to ask qui tuhanu Angrezzi onde heh? Or even tuhardu qui haal heh? (Do you understand English? How are you?). 


    That said, my style of learning isn’t exclusively auditory. I feel like I need to -see- the language. This is particularly true for some times when the pronunciation seemed to vary or shift. In particular, when they were teaching me how to say that I’m good, the male narrator seemed to say meh TEAK huh while the female narrator consistently sounded like meh PEAK huh. I had to defer to a Punjabi expert to clarify what I was hearing.


    I do wish that they gave you some more lessons for the cost; it gives some very introductory phrases, which is fine, but selling the lessons in packs of 5 left a little bit more to be desired. They sometimes explain why the language is the way it is, but I could have used a little more there. For instance, I was a little unclear on word order (and even the separation of some words), or why some words changed forms in different contexts. At times they explain the general idea; men say bolda to refer to the verb speaking and women use boldi. I *think* I’ve inferred that when you’re making a statement you say something like “manu Angrezzi bolda heh” but if you’re responding to a question you might say “manu Angrezzi bolda ho.”


    Anyway, I suppose it’s a matter of your philosophy of language and your learning style. The Pimsleur courses are reliant on conversational repetition. I wouldn’t mind, though, getting some more background on why the language works the way it does. I think coming out of French Immersion I got used to the idea of rules being well-established and then applying the rules; here it’s the reverse—you see rules in application and only afterward do you start to infer the rules. This approach made things like asking for directions particularly difficult because the word order is essentially reversed—something like “This road where is you know?” or when words changed in context; for instance, the word for speaking well is different from doing other things well. Actually, learning how to ask for directions was a hard unit and anecdotally it seemed like it went faster than the other units, but that may just have been my panic.


-Qui tuhanu Punjabi onde heh?
-Hanji. Qui tusee Amrikan ho?
-Naheenji. Parr manu tori tori Angrezzi. Manu Punjabi bhoti ziada nahee onde heh.

-Tuhanu ta Punjabi bahot changitera onde heh!


    I ended up reviewing each of the lessons several times, though they build in helpful repetition from previous units. I feel like I’ve more or less mastered the first three of the five units, but I’m still struggling over the directions and the words for saying you want something to eat or drink (helpful memory tip: if you associate words in a different language from the one you speak to words in your own language, it can help! For instance, “later” sounds like “bad witch” in English and I enjoy that very much.”


    Ultimately, Pimsleur courses are going to be very restrictive by nature. You’ll learn conversational phrases that might work in small talk. I’m sure that eventually the lessons will get increasingly difficult and more complex. Overall, though, I think I will need additional resources to help me learn the language—I need to see it, hear it from more voices, speak it, read it. I need the full experience, especially if my goal is to write some poems in Punjabi.


    If nothing else, trying to learn a language really can promote some empathy for all the people trying to master English—a different script, different sounds, different grammatical structure. Eesh it’s tough.


    Anyway, ਖੁਸ਼ ਪੜ੍ਹਨਾ!